Investigation Reviews Deep Dive
New to Dropzone? We recommend starting with our overview of The Platform, specifically the Dashboard and Investigations sections, to familiarize yourself with how alerts flow through the system.
Once you’re comfortable, you’re ready to begin reviewing investigations.
Overview: Investigation Reviews
Investigation Reviews enable SOC analysts to validate AI-completed alert investigations for accuracy and completeness. This process ensures high-quality security analysis while creating feedback loops that continuously improve Dropzone’s automated investigation capabilities.
Reviews help:
Confirm AI conclusions align with your SOPs
Reduce false positives
Capture institutional knowledge
Improve future investigation accuracy
You may follow your existing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) or use Dropzone’s built-in Quality Assurance checklist when reviewing investigations.
What You’ll See Here
Investigation Queue Management Efficient filtering and prioritization of completed investigations
Review Interface Navigation A walkthrough of all investigation review components
Feedback Systems Context Memory creation and Custom Strategy development
Quality Assurance Workflows Structured approaches to validating investigations
Outcome Management Conclusion changes and investigation status updates
Knowledge Base Integration Leveraging reviews for long-term organizational learning
How Investigation Reviews Work
Review Process Model
Investigation Completion The AI completes an automated investigation of security alerts.
Review Queue Completed investigations enter the review queue with an In Review status.
Analyst Assessment Human analysts evaluate the AI’s conclusions, evidence, and reasoning.
Feedback Integration Review outcomes improve AI performance through Context Memory and strategies.
Status Updates Investigations move from In Review to Reviewed.
Review Components
Investigation Data
Each investigation review provides access to:
Complete Alert Context Original alert details, triggering rules, and metadata
AI Analysis Results Investigative findings, evidence, and reasoning
Supporting Evidence API calls, queries, and data sources used
Recommended Actions Suggested follow-up steps based on the investigation outcome
Review Tools
Approval Workflows Single-click approval for accurate investigations
Conclusion Modification Ability to change investigation outcomes with justification
Context Memory Creation Add organizational knowledge for future AI reference
Custom Strategy Development Encode reusable investigation logic for alert patterns
Quality Assurance Model
Investigation reviews support structured quality assurance across several dimensions:
Accuracy Validation Confirm AI conclusions match evidence and organizational context
Completeness Assessment Ensure all relevant investigative angles were explored
False Positive Reduction Identify and correct misclassified benign activity
Knowledge Transfer Capture institutional expertise to improve future investigations
Accessing Investigations
Login and Tenant Selection
Navigate to your Dropzone AI tenant home page (for example,
https://mycompany.dropzone.app)If you have multiple tenants, use the tenant tree to navigate between environments
Investigation Queue Access
In the left navigation menu, click "Investigations"
Select investigations by Priority:
Urgent
Notable
Informational
Use filters to refine results by:
Conclusion
Interview usage
Source
And more

Investigation components
Each investigation contains multiple sections, detailed below.
Notes
Located in the upper right, the Notes section is a space for analyst observations and feedback to allow for team communication around the investigation.
Notes currently do not influence AI behavior directly.
Investigation Threads
Here you will find the AI-generated questions guiding the investigation.
Click the carrot on the right of each question to expand and view all findings derived from Evidence Locker entries, including:
Thread Findings A detailed view of all information used in the finding (device information, filenames, logins, user IDs, etc)
Sources Queried A list of all sources used in the finding
Additional Threads Further questions generated by the result of the finding
Actions
Here you will find a graph of the AI's actions throughout the investigation, grouped by stage.
You may also click the button labeled "AI Action Graph" in the Table of Contents to see this visualization.

Alert Claim
An overview of the triggering alert and detection rule. Below is a list of Associated Entities (Hosts, users, IP addresses, and other related entities) involved in the alert.
Click "View All Details" to see the root code run and returned during the investigation.
Conclusion Reasoning
The AI-determined outcome with supporting context and confidence. Below is a list of applicable Insight Tags detailing the content of the investigation, such as common scams and flagged behaviors.

Key Findings
Summaries of the five most significant findings influencing the AI’s conclusion
Interviews Tab
Here you will find a record of all interactions with the AI interviewer involved in this investigation.
Interview Details State, creation time, last update, and recipient
Interview Question and Context The question asked and why it was generated
Resulting Communications Full conversation if the recipient responds
Approval Button Available when auto-approval is not enabled
Containment Actions
Here you may add containment actions based on the investigation outcome. To do so, do the following:
Click "+ Add Actions"
Select the action you wish to perform, e.g. "Contain Device"
Enter the entity you wish to contain, e.g. "desktop1"
Add actions until done
Click "Save"

Recommendations
A list of recommended remediation actions to contain the threat. You may mark them as completed by clicking "Mark complete" on the right

Evidence Locker
A record of all evidence used in the investigation.
Source The external systems accessed during the investigation
Request The specific query and/or action performed by the AI
Response Click "View Response" to see the raw and processed results from each source
Changelog
A chronological record of all investigation events, including prior review activity and modifications.
Investigation Review
Standard Approval Process
Verify the Conclusion aligns with your SOPs
Select Close to keep the same Conclusion
The investigation moves to Reviewed
Conclusion Modification
If the conclusion does not align with your SOPs, do the following:
Use the dropdowns in the top-right to update the Conclusion to:
Malicious
Suspicious
Inconclusive
Benign
Add notes explaining why the Conclusion was changed
Click "Save" to move the investigation to Reviewed

Onboarding Recommendation
During onboarding, we recommend reviewing 10–15+ investigations per day for the first few weeks, prioritizing:
Urgent
Malicious
Suspicious
This accelerates alignment with your internal SOPs and helps tune Dropzone quickly.
What’s Next?
Once you’re comfortable reviewing investigations, explore our Best Practice guides for:
Building Custom Strategies
Setting up Response Actions
Leveraging Context Memory
Some advanced features are available to Admins only.
Last updated
Was this helpful?